Radiometric dating and Carbon dating has proven to be unreliable by a number of Scientists due to contamination of test results and the changing climate.Did you know that evolution is false logic based on opinions,conjectures,chance and faulty dating methods?
Consider this
The Young Age of the Earth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…
The Origin of Man by Dr. Duane Gish
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3FZDysZK…
The Origins of Life
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…
Creation In The 21st Century From Where did these Layers Come (From) 1 of 3 (Global Flood)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZyoXQJ5A…
Creation in the 21st Century - Overwhelming Evidence 1 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o226umqLd…
Skull Fossils - As Empty as the Evolutionary Theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Yu5jN897…
Neanderthals - Smarter Then We Thought
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxL636n3w…
Dinosaurs: Those Terrible Lizards
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVvGByvp1…
Our Solar System: Evidence For Creation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…
Birds and Flight: Evolved or Designed?
http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=e…
Did you know that evolution is false logic based on opinions,conjectures,chance and faulty dating methods?
Actually the logic behind evolution is not false at all. What you are referring to is the support behind the theory. But then again one can prove evolution within a lifetime. That doesn't prove that evolution explains where we come from... But species evolve to adapt to an environment. It doesn't get much more logical than that... Otherwise the environment would be constant, or all life would be immortal.
Nice usage of words
.
Only thing is with the diversity of the types of life on earth to not have evolution is next to impossible to not of happen
.
Just the insect world has more different types of insets than there are people on all the planet earth
.
And to think that God took his time to make over 500,000,000 insects is near insane to think that is important to God
.
And to think of making mankind last after all the life on the planet was created is also kind of hard to fathom
.
And to make man with out a mate woman when every one of those bugs and birds and fish of the sea has a mate female
.
And to have forgotten to of made a mate for the man may just go to show you
.
How important we are in Gods eye
.
And remember when the flood started and Noah was on board God said
I regret the day I made man
.
Genesis chapter 6 v 5
.
I thought that lying was a sin. Although, I guess if you do it from ignorance you might have an excuse. Please research your claims with creditable sources.
Radiometric dating is considered accurate by the scientific community and the same principles are used in the national atomic clock.
Um... Carbon dating isn't used for fossils, Einstein. Have you read about: rubidium/strontium, thorium/lead, potassium/argon, argon/argon, or uranium/lead dating methods?
Evolution is a fact - you ARE the product of evolution from earlier (yes, ape-like) forms. Consider the evidence:
Common sense says, if we see small changes today within species, that small changes over a long time will become large changes. That makes more sense than ';everything appeared suddenly from thin air, but magically containing all this evidence that it evolved.';
Evolution is set of proven facts. People will respond by saying it is ';Only a Theory';, but they don't understand (or refuse to accept) that a scientific theory is a model supported by many facts that nobody has yet disproved.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_…
Paleontology and the fossil record completely support evolution. The theory of evolution even predicts some fossils before we find them. Any good scientific theory makes many predictions. Here's a good example of a prediction made by evolution that then came true:
http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/searching4…
People will say the fossil record doesn't support evolution. That is a lie. What they are doing is distorting the statements of scientists like Stephen Jay Gould, who said the fossil record doesn't support classic Darwinian ';gradualism'; - the idea that change occurs at a constant rate. It's not steady - it happens in fits and starts. BUT, Gould and all other credible scientsts agree the fossil record completely supports biological (non-Divine) evolution from one species to another. Think of Darwin as Newton and Gould as Einstein - the theory of relativity didn't make Newtonian physics invalid - it refined it and added to it. Similarly, Gould (et al.) refined Darwinian evolution.
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:tZM…
Geology supports evolution - we NEVER find fossils from one age embedded in the rock from a different age.
Genetics supports evolution 100%. If evolution is true, then we'd expect humans to share some genes with mushrooms, lots of genes with fish and most genes with primates. And guess what - we do!
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
Molecular biology proves that all life comes from common ancestors:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/…
Evolution can be seen happening today, in nature and in labs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/scienc…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli_lon…
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200…
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13845002/
So if your beliefs do not agree with the reality of evolution, and that bothers you, you will have to find a way to reconcile your beliefs. Perhaps you can follow the guidance of these 12,000 enlightened Christian clergy:
http://www.butler.edu/clergyproject/Chri…
If you'd like more information, or explanations of any of this, please write.
wow
its false because of carbon dating
evolution has been proved in the laboratry and in the wild....
nothing to do with carbon dating there.
let me guess you read this in an Awake magazine? or some other fundamentalist literature.
please,please, reasearch what you are saying.
This is a very silly post. I get a kick out of anyone who believes in fairies saying that evolution is ';false logic';. Thanks for the humor. Even if what you say is true, it says nothing about the logic behind evolution, but only about some of the evidence.
As opposed to the Bible ... which is based on hard facts ???
If you follow the logic of the Bible, God created Adam and Eve, and they only had two sons. Leaving aside the taboo of incest, that must surely have been the end of that !
Did you know our genetic link to the great apes has already been proven.
';Generation and annotation of human chromosomes 2 %26amp; 4';
Hillier et al, Nature 2005.
We share a common ancestor, and did NOT come from them.
*yawn*
Did you know this argument is really, really old, and probably has a much more convincing counter-argument somewhere.
No. I didn't know that, and it doesn't amount to a hill of beans if you ask me. Wrong section. You are about to get your nuts in a vise.
Oh, IJR gets it, now. You misspelled CREATIONISM as evolution. An easy mistake, and IJR forgives you.
Sound like you've been listening to the propaganda that the church puts out to make it sound like the bible is based on scientific fact.
Oh, did YOU know that many scientists have proven the bible to be unreliable?
And you're contradicting yourself. Changing climate.. evolution.. get it?
Yeah, no kidding?!
So instead of wasting your time posting this on Yahoo Answers, why aren't you out there organizing your evidence and writing papers for submission to peer-reviewed journals?
';............faulty dating methods...';
LMAO!!
Im sorry!!
I had a visual!!!
faulty dating methods...... omg..... I have a cartoon to draw!!! BRB!!
.
I know- its a total conspiracy from the evil god hating scientists.
We all know the truth- the smurfs intelligent designed EVERYTHING in four 24 hour days.
It says so right here....
%26lt;rolls eyes%26gt;
This is false, and any creationist who accepts paternity tests as valid knows it. Anything else?
would you mind elaborating? you cant just say ';its wrong'; without explaining why its wrong. so why is it wrong? either respond here or email me.
That's right -- and remember: stars are merely twinkling lights to lighten the night sky and NO star is older than 6,012 years old!
Ok...come up with a better theory that can be tested, documented, and observed, and then we can talk. Kthanxbai
Sure...it makes infinitely more sense that a magical man in the sky created the universe in just under a week.
You're funny...
Did you know that other, educated, Christians are embarrassed by you?
yes i know carbon dating is inaccurate.
Like the study they did on freshly killed seals blood that dated the seals blood as 1300 years old.....
No there is evolution. I thought Charles Darwin established that...
So dinosaurs and humans coexisting is MORE plausible?
Right...
Please Youtube ';Why do people laugh at creationists';.
It'll do you a world of good.
No, I don't know that. Neither do you, actually.
Faulty dating methods?!
Well, that explains why I am on Yahoo! Answers on Friday nights!
so humans, dinosaurs, universe 6000 years ago.. alrighty then. follow the sheep. I think theyre heading for that cliff.
as opposed to your Book the bible that is based on the words of goat herding arabs?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment